During our 20 years in governance, one truth has never changed: people sit at the heart of effective governance and Board performance. Even as organizations explore how AI might augment – or even supplant – aspects of the Director role, good governance still depends on human judgment, behaviour, and the dynamics between Directors.
Most organizations rely on a skills matrix to assemble the right talent. These often include functional skills, sector knowledge, and experience in key executive roles. Some also include diversity considerations. While these tools are useful, they don’t always prevent Boards from struggling with Directors who add limited value or with unhealthy dynamics in the boardroom. In today’s environment, one shaped by geopolitical tension, trade disruption, and rapid technological change, Boards need much more. They must expect more of Directors and create the conditions for meaningful dialogue and decision-making.
The Challenge
One of Watson’s core beliefs is simple: every Director should add value to the organization they serve. Yet recent data suggests many Boards aren’t there. A PwC study of more than 600 Directors shows it:
Frustration in the boardroom is mounting… 55% of public company directors surveyed believe at least one colleague should be replaced… The most common concern fueling this view is a lack of meaningful contribution to Board discussions.
These results mirror the structural issues we see in recruitment, development, and assessment:
- Board appointment processes allow for too much bias and discretion, often overvaluing charismatic personalities over demonstrated effectiveness.
- Prior Board experience is frequently used as a proxy for competency, narrowing the pool of capable candidates.
- Boards lack clarity about how to develop good Directors into great ones.
- Assessment and feedback processes are inconsistent and rarely actionable.
- It is often difficult to differentiate between a high-performing Director and one with the right competencies to serve as Board Chair or Committee Chair.
Most of the tools Boards rely on today are not evidence-based. As expectations increase and complexity grows, this gap puts Board effectiveness at risk. After working with more than 500 Boards and thousands of Directors, we know that the most effective Directors bring competencies that go far beyond what appears on a résumé or skills matrix.
We often hear “you just know” when someone is a talented Director. At Watson, we believed we could do better – that we could define, seek out, and assess the underlying competencies that enable a Director to excel. Until now, we screened for these implicitly. But we had not yet developed a complete, evidence-based framework.
The Director Competency Framework
To address this, we brought together academic research, our experience in Director recruitment and peer feedback processes, and validation from clients to create the Director Competency Framework. This Framework articulates the attributes and working styles required for successful performance in the Director role. Role descriptions outline what a Director does. A skills matrix captures what Directors know. The Framework focuses on how Directors perform. Working with an external research partner, we defined objective criteria grounded in psychological research. We set out to identify:
- Core Competencies every Director must exhibit.
- Differentiating Competencies that distinguish exceptional Directors from good ones.
- Chair Competencies reflecting the unique leadership role and outsized impact of the Board Chair, including shaping Board culture, facilitating dialogue, navigating conflict, and serving as the primary link between the Board and the CEO.
Below are the competencies within the Framework.
Director Core Competencies
Baseline competencies essential to every Board
- Knowledgeable
- Ethical
- Motivated beyond self
- Engaged
- Inclusive
- Collaborative
Director Differentiating Competencies
Competencies that elevate performance
- System-wide strategist
- Courageous
- Emotionally intelligent
- Curious learner
- Adaptable
- Thoughtful contributor
Chair Competencies
Competencies essential for effective Board Chairs
- System-wide strategist
- Influence
- Leadership
- Inclusive facilitator
- Catalytic leadership
Each competency is accompanied by detailed descriptions and a five-point Likert scale that describes what the behaviours look like at different levels of development. These behavioural anchors reduce bias in self-assessments, peer feedback, and recruitment, and they help Directors better understand their true strengths and opportunities for growth.
The Director Competency Framework in Practice
Embedding the Framework enhances Board performance in several ways:
1. More intentional succession planning
The Framework supports smoother Board renewal by clarifying the competencies required for Chair and Committee Chair roles.
In a recent Chair succession process, using the Framework enabled the Board to define a clearer Success Profile. Directors were able to distinguish between strong contributions in a Director capacity and the distinct competencies required to lead as Board Chair. This alignment helped the Board navigate a high-stakes decision with confidence and set the stage for a smooth transition.
2. Clearer, more objective recruitment
Defining the required competencies creates more rigor in the recruitment process and broadens candidate pools by reducing the reliance on prior Board experience as a proxy for effectiveness.
As one Chair told us during validation:
“This is what I’m really looking for when recruiting a new Director. We know we can find candidates with the skills — but how they contribute is far more important.”
3. Stronger feedback and development
Grounding peer feedback in the Framework increases Director confidence in the process and improves its usefulness.
In one recent assessment cycle, the use of behavioural definitions led to more discerning ratings than in previous years. The Chair gained clearer insight into each Director’s contributions, and Directors received richer, more actionable feedback that supported their development.
4. Enhanced Chair effectiveness
A clearer understanding of Directors’ individual strengths and development areas helps Chairs lead discussions with intention and support more productive meetings.
Why This Matters
High-performing Directors possess relevant skills and experience, demonstrate the Core and Differentiating Competencies, and operate within a healthy Board culture, one shaped and supported by an effective Chair.
Most organizations focus primarily on skills and experience, and to a lesser extent, on culture. Both matter greatly, and both can be improved. But very few Boards explicitly consider the competencies required for Directors to excel. After two decades of working closely with Boards, we believe this is the element that most reliably differentiates good Directors from exceptional ones. This Framework reflects the insights we have gathered over twenty years of helping Boards find the right Directors, develop their talent, and enhance effectiveness. Governance continues to evolve, shaped by shifting mandates, complex operating environments, and rising expectations.
With so much riding on Canadian organizations’ ability to navigate uncertainty, we believe it is time to deepen our collective understanding of what it means to serve as a Director today. The Director Competency Framework provides Boards with the tools to manage composition more effectively, support individual development, and increase their impact.
In a future article, we will explore how organizations can move beyond a traditional skills matrix. By effectively integrating these competencies alongside directors’ skills and elements of the organization’s purpose and culture, organizations can implement a comprehensive Board Success Profile: a multidimensional view of board composition that supports stronger governance.
We offer this work in the hope that Boards – and the organizations they serve – can meet the demands of these fractious times and shape successful futures for many years to come.
)
)
)
